BURLINGTON — City officials have started the process of securing engineering design and construction management services for the $9 million overhaul of Echo Lake.
Information about the project, which involves rebuilding a dam and dredging pollutants, is available at https://www.burlington-wi.gov/bids.aspx?bidID=23.
A mandatory pre-proposal site visit is scheduled for 10 a.m. Nov. 29 at Echo Park Pavilion, 589 Milwaukee Ave. Proposals are due Dec. 8.
Peter Riggs, the city’s public works director, said “the selected firm must have experience and demonstrated success with similar projects.”
Watch now: As the city debates the future of Echo Lake, Burlington residents explain why they want to save the manmade lake
The Burlington City Council is scheduled in February to select a firm, which must submit a plan for DNR approval by June 1.
People are also reading…
Another round of bidding is planned in late 2024, with contracts awarded in January 2025 for construction.
The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources notified city officials in 2015 that the manmade dam at Echo Lake was no longer adequate to meet state flood-control standards and gave the city 10 years to bring the dam and lake into compliance.
The city had to choose between rebuilding the dam, or removing the dam and allowing the 70-acre Echo Lake impoundment to drain into the White River, which flows through the site.
The Burlington Park Board called for removing the dam and creating a new riverfront attraction. But in November 2022 public referendum, voters favored a scenario in which the dam would be rebuilt and the lake preserved.
Watch now: As the city debates the future of Echo Lake, Burlington residents explain why they want to remove the manmade lake
Engineers estimated saving the lake would cost about $5 million, while removing the dam and draining the lake could be achieved for about $1.5 million.
With optional amenities included to improve the site as a public recreation resource, the price tag has grown to $9.1 million. The city has included $10 million for the project in a long-term capital improvement plan.
The state has approved a $1 million grant to help Burlington pay for the project.
City officials estimate saving Echo Lake could cost property owners an average of $2,800 each in higher taxes. Removing the lake would have cost $409 on average.
10 states where river flooding will cost US homeowners the most
10 states where river flooding will cost US homeowners the most
While coastal flooding from hurricanes tends to get the most media attention, flooding from overflowing rivers or streams affects all fifty states and is on the rise due to climate change. Known as riverine flooding, it can present a significant threat of property damage that homeowners should be aware of. To explore the impact of riverine flooding on homeowners, MoneyGeek analyzed data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) most recent National Risk Index to determine the expected cost of property damage per year due to riverine flooding events.
KEY FINDINGS:
- Damage to property caused by riverine flooding is expected to cost $2.9 billion every year. Riverine flooding is the third costliest natural cause of property damage, behind hurricanes and earthquakes.
- The cost of property damage from riverine flooding is highest for residents of Louisiana, where annual expected losses total $51 per person.
- Texas can expect to lose $962 million in property damage to riverine flooding annually, the highest total loss in the nation; the state also has the second-highest expected per capita cost ($32) in the U.S.
- Connecticut experiences the least flooding in terms of costly damage to property, with just $0.63 per capita in expected yearly damages.
- Riverine flooding affects all states and is four times costlier than coastal flooding.

States Where Riverine Flooding Costs Homeowners the Most
So which states are most at risk of experiencing economic losses from riverine flooding? Some states and regions are more flood-prone than others, with five of the top ten states for losses in the Southeastern United States.
The number one state for flood losses, Louisiana, has an expected property damage per capita of $51 per person. That’s much more than the second state on the list, Texas, where residents were expected to pay $32 each in damages. However, because Texas is more populous, its total projected flood losses came in at a staggering $962 million, while smaller Louisiana’s losses are projected to be $232 million.
Although flood losses are more likely in the Southeast, flooding can happen in all fifty states. North Dakota, Vermont, Iowa, Nevada and New Jersey also held spots in the top ten states for costliest flood losses.
MoneyGeek found that riverine flooding is four times more costly than coastal flooding. Given that riverine flooding affects all fifty states and coastal flooding only touches thirty-two, this may not be surprising, but the monetary difference between the two types of predicted flood damages is staggering: $2.9 billion is expected to be lost to riverine flooding, compared to $783 million to coastal flooding.
Flooding Risks and Homeowners Insurance
Flooding risks are increasing due to climate change, and flood damage is predicted to rise 26% over the next thirty years. As the atmospheric temperature rises, so does the amount of moisture in the air, increasing the chances of rain and sudden violent storms that can cause flash flooding.
While riverine flooding can happen in any area where available natural or constructed channels for water are full, flash flooding can cause large amounts of water to move rapidly through an area. Due to the water’s density, these flooding events can be extremely dangerous. FEMA estimates that water from a flood moving at 10 miles per hour can put as much pressure on a structure as 270 mile-per-hour wind gusts.
Although every state in the country is potentially at risk from riverine flooding, some communities bear a higher risk than others. Over the next thirty years, flooding in poor communities, particularly those with large Black populations in the American South, is predicted to increase by 20%. Often, the municipalities in these areas have yet to invest in flood adaptation or improved infrastructure, and studies show that during disaster recovery, poorer communities are less likely to receive aid than wealthier communities.
Protecting Your Home and Belongings from Flooding
Navigating climate change and insurance as a homeowner can be confusing, especially since most homeowner insurance policies do not cover flooding from weather events. The loss of property from flooding events can be extreme, but both homeowners and renters can take the following measures to protect themselves:
- Find out if you live in a flood zone.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) website offers a flood map where you can learn whether your address is affected by flooding.
- Learn more about flood insurance.
Check with your insurance agent to see what types of damage are covered by a good flood insurance policy. FEMA offers residential flood insurance policies through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Find out what is and isn’t covered. For example, some flood insurance policies cover structure only, while others may include contents. However, most policies will not cover damages caused to personal property stored in basements.
- Educate yourself — even if you’re a renter.
Renters insurance also does not usually cover flooding, but renters living in flood-prone areas can purchase additional coverage to protect their property.
- Check your auto insurance coverage.
Auto owners should look for a comprehensive policy that covers flooding. Otherwise, the loss of a vehicle due to flooding may not be covered by your auto insurance.
